
STEVENSON'S 147 SNOBBERY: TOO SMALL OR TOO SMART?
Shakur Stevenson's refusal to consider welterweight bouts due to perceived size disadvantages has sparked debate. This British boxing journalist questions if it's genuine concern or a strategic avoidance of tougher challenges.
Shakur Stevenson, the American slickster, is making waves across the pond, but his recent comments about welterweight have raised a few eyebrows. The man's a talent, no doubt, a proper technician in the sweet science, but he's flat-out rejecting fights at 147lbs. Claims he's too small for the likes of Ryan Garcia and Devin Haney at that weight. Now, hold on a minute, Shakur. This isn't the playground, this is professional boxing. You're a world-class operator, and while size matters, skill often trumps it. We've seen smaller men conquer giants in this game. Think about Nigel Benn, a middleweight, stepping up and giving it his all. Or the sheer heart of Ricky Hatton, never backing down from a challenge, regardless of the opponent's frame. Is this a genuine concern for his physical well-being, or is it a calculated move to avoid the toughest challenges until he's absolutely ready? The cynic in me, who's seen a few too many ducked fights on the cobbles, leans towards the latter. Boxing fans want to see the best fight the best. If you're talking about legacy, Shakur, you've got to step up and prove it. Don't just talk about being great; show us you're willing to walk through fire, even if the bloke opposite you is a few inches taller. That's what separates the good from the truly legendary in this brutal sport.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation

