ADAMES DODGES SHEERAZ REMATCH: IS HE RUNNING SCARED OR JUST SMART?

Hamzah Sheeraz, the East London assassin, is still licking his wounds after that controversial stoppage against Carlos Adames. But the talk from the Dominican camp? It's a proper head-scratcher. Adames, the WBC interim middleweight champ, is apparently 'open' to a rematch, yet he's also claiming he 'won' the first dust-up. Won? The referee stepped in, mate! That's not exactly a definitive victory, is it? It leaves a sour taste, a proper 'what if' hanging in the air like smoke from a ringside cigar.

This isn't about sour grapes; it's about the sweet science. When a fight ends like that, with a British lad showing heart and skill, the public demands clarity. They want to see it settled, fair and square, under the lights. Adames might have the belt, but Sheeraz had him wobbling, had him thinking. He showed he belongs at that elite level, a true heir to the likes of Benn or Eubank. To suggest he 'won' outright is a bit rich, frankly. It sounds more like a man trying to talk himself out of a return bout he knows could go very differently.

If Adames truly believes he's the better man, why the hesitation? Why the lukewarm 'openness' to a rematch? The fans, especially the British faithful, deserve to see this settled. Sheeraz proved his mettle; now it's up to Adames to prove his. Don't be a bottler, champ. Give the people what they want: a proper, no-excuses, middleweight war. Anything less feels like a sidestep, a tacit admission that Sheeraz might just have his number after all. Let's see who's got the real chin of granite.